Direct answer: In the same batch of 30 equipment makers, 25 homepages could be analysed and 21 exposed a same-origin contact entry in their static HTML. Twenty contact pages loaded, but only 9 contained a recognisable inquiry form, 11 had a tel link, 8 had mailto, 5 had a privacy notice and none used ContactPage or ContactPoint structured data. This is a pilot, not an industry benchmark.

When we wrote the acceptance clauses, item 7 asked for "at most two clicks to the inquiry page, a static form or mailto/tel, and a privacy notice nearby". At that point the item rested on project experience, not samples. This round adds the observation on the same list: the clause is unchanged, but each part now maps to a count.

25
analysable homepages (of 30)
21
expose a same-origin contact entry
20
contact pages returned HTTP 200
9
with a recognisable inquiry form
5
with a privacy notice
0
with ContactPage markup

Method: how the 25 homepages were obtained

The frame follows the earlier scan: positions 71–100 of the 2024 Changzhou first-set major equipment list, 30 companies, with official sites identified by searching "company name + official site/homepage". Four companies had no identifiable site and one had an unreachable robots.txt, which we skip conservatively, leaving 25 homepages with usable saved HTML.

This round did not refetch homepages; it reused the HTML saved the same day and fetched only the first contact/inquiry link per site. Robots verdicts from the same day were reused (UA LingyiResearchBot/1.0, fetch only when own_bot=allowed). Requests were 6 seconds apart with a 20-second timeout, no JavaScript and no form submission. Raw HTML stays outside the repository and is not published.

FieldRule
contact_linkA same-origin contact/inquiry <a href> exists in the homepage's static HTML
Link priorityhref matches contact / lianxi / lxwm = 3; link text matches "contact us" = 2; inquiry/quote/message = 1; highest score, ties by document order
inquiry_formA form with email, tel or textarea plus a submit or text field
privacy_linkAny link whose href or text contains privacy (or the Chinese word for privacy)
jsonld_contactContactPage or ContactPoint appears in JSON-LD

Only links present in the static homepage HTML count; URLs are not guessed and JavaScript is not executed. Same-origin means the same host, treating http and https as one site.

Result 1: entries are common, but not default

HomepageCountNote
Same-origin contact entry21 / 2512 matched by URL, 9 only by visible link text
No contact entry4 / 253 homepages had no <a> tag at all, one of them with 11 characters of text; the other had 99 links but no contact/inquiry target
Entry page failed1 / 21The target was unreachable; an entry is not a working page

The 9 text-only matches matter: their URLs contain no contact-like word, so only the visible label identifies them. A URL-only automated check would call those 9 "no entry", while a text-only check would be fooled by footer links that point somewhere else.

Result 2: static usability of contact pages

Static featurePresentShare of 20 loaded pages
Any <form>1575%
Recognisable inquiry form945%
tel: link1155%
mailto: link840%
Privacy notice link525%
ContactPage / ContactPoint markup00%
Exactly one H11050%
No H11050%

Median contact-page HTML was 58.2 KB and median visible text 5,634 characters (one fetch per site; not a performance or content-quality conclusion).

Read the first three rows together: 15 pages have a form, but only 9 qualify as inquiry forms. The gap is search boxes, newsletter sign-ups and button-only forms that look like forms but do not collect a lead. 11 pages offer tel and 8 offer mailto (every page with mailto also had tel, so 11 have at least one), while only 5 carry a privacy notice, the weakest item in the group.

H1 follows the product-page pilot: half the contact pages have no H1 at all. Visually there is a headline; semantically there is none. Visitors rarely notice, screen readers and extraction do.

Result 3: structured data stops at the homepage

Five homepages in this sample carry JSON-LD, mostly Organization. On the contact pages it drops to zero ContactPage or ContactPoint. The markup is not absent from the sites; it simply does not reach the page where address, phone, email and opening hours — exactly ContactPoint's fields — matter most.

One counterpoint: tel links (55%) outnumber mailto (40%), so "phone first" is the more common pattern. Adding markup without a tappable tel link still leaves mobile users copying a number by hand.

Against acceptance clause 7

Clause requirementObservation
At most two clicks to the inquiry page21/25 homepages expose it in one click; 4 have no static entry
Form fields and submit button in static HTML9/20 have a recognisable inquiry form; 15/20 have any form
Provide mailto or tel as fallbacktel 11/20, mailto 8/20; 9/20 have neither
Privacy notice near the form5/20 have a privacy link, the lowest of the four
Structured data consistent with visible contentContactPage/ContactPoint 0/20

The clause did not change. What changed is the default assumption at acceptance: do not treat "there is a contact page" as "there is a usable inquiry path". Split it into five verdicts — entry exists, page returns 200, static form fields, fallback contact, privacy notice — instead of one tick.

Five actionable conclusions

  1. Test the static layer first. Open the homepage with JavaScript off and look for the contact link; 3 homepages here had no <a> tag at all in static HTML.
  2. Do not look only at URLs. 9 of 21 entries were identifiable only by visible text.
  3. Judge forms by fields, not appearance. 15 pages had a form; only 9 collected a lead.
  4. Add a tel or mailto. When a form fails this is the only fallback; 9 of 20 pages had neither.
  5. Put the privacy notice beside the form. At 25% coverage, most pages collect data without a nearby explanation of purpose or retention.

Limits

  • Non-random sample: one list, one city, list-order selection, 25 analysable sites; a pilot, not the industry.
  • First entry only: sites may offer other entries in footers, floating widgets or QR codes; not enumerated here.
  • Static HTML boundary: JavaScript-injected forms are recorded as absent. That is a property of the method, not a final defect verdict.
  • No submission test: no form was filled, sent or checked, so form delivery and inquiry conversion are unknown.
  • Single fetch: one request per site on one day; no repeat measurement, and HTML size is not a performance claim.
  • No naming: the public data carries sample_id and fields only, never company names, domains or page titles.

Data and recalculation

Anonymised data: equipment-contact-path-pilot-2026.csv (25 rows, 13 fields, including sample_id and capture time). The repository also keeps docs/research/2026-11-contact-path-pilot.csv.

Probe and rules: scripts/contact_path_probe.py; tests: scripts/test_contact_path_probe.py (21 tests, no network). Run:

python -m unittest scripts.test_contact_path_probe

Related: the 12 acceptance clauses (item 7 is the one compared here), the 30-site robots scan and the 15 product-page pilot.

Sources and definitions

  1. Frame: 2024 Changzhou first-set major equipment list (Changzhou Industry and IT Bureau public notice, December 2024), positions 71–100.
  2. Crawl compliance: RFC 9309, Robots Exclusion Protocol: rfc-editor.org.
  3. Vocabulary: schema.org ContactPage / ContactPoint: schema.org.
  4. Capture window: 2026-11-01 18:41–18:47 Asia/Shanghai, UA LingyiResearchBot/1.0, one page per site, 6 seconds apart.
About the author

Lingyi Information Official (delivery team) works on requirements, solutions and acceptance for corporate websites, brand systems and smart manufacturing projects. This is a pilot observation and method record, not an evaluation, ranking or procurement recommendation for any company; the sample cannot be generalised.

Split the contact path into five verdicts

Bring your contact page and form. We check the static layer, fallback contact, privacy notice and structured data, and hand back a recheckable list.

Request a contact-path review