Direct answer: The 36 article pages from study 45 were rechecked about 40 hours later (2026-11-03 08:41 → 2026-11-05 00:40), and all 41 URLs still return 200. 31 of 36 pages have an identical link structure; only the five E14 pages each lose one link and one nofollow. Totals move from 3,583 to 3,578 links and 173 to 168 nofollow; internal, external, external URLs, external hosts, target=_blank and empty anchor text do not change.

Another 16 pages changed response size (−259 to +86 bytes) without any structural effect. The five JS shells remain ~1.4 KB 200 responses.

36
pages rechecked
31
unchanged structure
5
changed structure
3,578
links
168
nofollow
16
size-changed pages

Method: same sample, same parser, delayed recheck

The plan was a 12-hour recheck; the global write lock was held by another track for a long time, so the actual recheck happened about 40 hours later. The article reports the real timing and does not call it a 12/24-hour recheck.

The same 41 URLs from study 45 were fetched serially on 2026-11-05 between 00:40 and 00:41, at least 0.8 s apart, with the same user agent. Non-200 responses were retried three times before being recorded as a change. Extraction still uses scripts/article_link_probe.py; comparison uses scripts/article_link_recheck.py.

ItemBaselineRecheck
Fetched2026-11-03 08:40–08:412026-11-05 00:40–00:41
Interval—About 40 hours
URLs / usable pages41 / 3641 / 36
JS shells55 (still 200)

Totals: five fewer links, all from nofollow

MeasureBaselineRecheckChange
Links3,5833,578−5
Internal3,0003,0000
External2702700
Unique external URLs (per-page sum)1741740
External hosts (per-page sum)1131130
rel with nofollow173168−5
target="_blank"2952950
No visible text3803800

The per-page sums are 174 external URLs and 113 hosts; after cross-page dedupe they remain study 45's 63 URLs and 15 hosts. No external target appeared or disappeared.

Changes are limited to the five E14 pages

Site / pageLinksnofollowBody
E14-1−1−1−16 B
E14-2−1−1−17 B
E14-3−1−1−16 B
E14-4−1−1−16 B
E14-5−1−1−16 B
Total−5−5—

All five pages lose one link and one nofollow together, with a 16–17 B size drop, matching a template edit that removed one nofollow link. The article does not infer why. The other 31 pages keep identical link counts.

Sixteen pages changed size, none changed structure

Size changePagesNote
−259 to −100 B2Two E23 pages
−99 to −1 B8Includes five E14 pages
0 B20Identical
+1 to +86 B6E03, E22, E23, E26

Size changes can come from timestamps, counters, random strings or minor content edits. The study did not diff pages individually; it only confirms that link counts did not change. Recording size and structure separately avoids treating a dynamic string as a redesign.

What this means for acceptance

  1. Template structure is stable. 31 of 36 pages keep the same structure after 40 hours, so rechecks can focus on the few changed pages.
  2. Trace changes to the template. All five E14 pages lose one link and one nofollow together, pointing to a template edit rather than an article edit.
  3. Size change is not structure change. Sixteen pages differ in bytes while links, external targets and empty anchors stay the same.
  4. Label the interval honestly. This is about 40 hours, not 12 or 24, and cannot be mixed with on-time rechecks.
  5. Keep shells separate. The five JS shells remain ~1.4 KB 200 responses; time did not turn them into content pages.

Limits

  • About 40 hours: delayed by the lock, so it does not represent change speed at 12 or 24 hours.
  • Single recheck: two points in time only; no cause or trend is inferred.
  • Page level: navigation, footer and recommendation modules are included; body links are not separated.
  • No byte diff: only size is recorded, not the specific change.
  • 10 sites, 36 pages: a pilot, no industry claim.

Data and reproduction

Anonymised data: equipment-article-links-recheck-2026.csv (36 rows × 32 columns: status, bytes, baseline/recheck/delta for eight link measures, structure and size change flags). The repository keeps docs/research/2026-11-article-links-recheck.csv. The baseline remains study 45's docs/research/2026-11-article-links.csv.

Parser: scripts/article_link_probe.py (10 tests); comparison: scripts/article_link_recheck.py (5 tests). Run:

python -m unittest scripts.test_article_link_probe scripts.test_article_link_recheck

Related: the article link structure pilot (study 45 baseline), the article heading outline pilot, and the unknown path and soft 404 pilot., and the page text share pilot

Sources and definitions

  1. Sample: the 41 article URLs from study 45 (10 sites; 36 usable + 5 JS shells).
  2. Baseline: 2026-11-03 08:40–08:41; recheck: 2026-11-05 00:40–00:41, serial, ≥0.8 s apart.
  3. Failure handling: non-200 retried three times before recording; all 41 returned 200.
  4. Comparison: eight link counts and status compared per page; size change recorded separately.
About the author

Lingyi Information Official (delivery team) works on requirements, proposals and acceptance for corporate websites, brand and smart-manufacturing projects. This article compares page-level link structure and response size at two points in time; it does not infer causes and is not a judgement of any site's rankings or traffic; the 10-site, 36-page sample is a pilot.

Structure first, bytes second

31 of 36 keep their structure after 40 hours; changes sit in one template; size change is not a redesign.

Request a recheck plan