Direct answer: A supplier bankruptcy/reorganization response page is not a line saying "the supplier failed, change supplier". The page should state: warning signs and exposure (prepayments, moulds/tooling, customer-supplied material, inventory, goods in transit, quality claims, warranty, IP/data); the proceedings (reorganization, settlement, bankruptcy liquidation) and the effects of court acceptance (individual repayment invalid, preservation lifted/execution suspended, litigation/arbitration suspended, administrator takes over); claim declaration (deadline, amount, security, evidence, review/objection); right of retrieval/goods in transit/set-off/security priority/guarantor recourse; continuation/termination of executory contracts, critical-supplier continuity and substitution; pre-bankruptcy protection (retention of title, mortgage/pledge, guarantees, prepayment control, tooling/customer-material marking, contract clauses); response playbook; and what must not be published. On the rules: the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law sets acceptance, administrator, claim declaration (minimum 30 days, maximum 3 months), right of retrieval, goods in transit, set-off, security priority, reorganization and distribution order; the Supreme People's Court interpretations (II) and (III) detail debtor property, retrieval/set-off/security priority, claim declaration and creditor rights; the Civil Code sets the basic rules on contracts, security and set-off. This article is current to 2026-11-08 and is a summary of public rules and page method, not legal, insolvency or claim-declaration advice; court rulings, administrator findings, contracts and case evidence control.
This article is for procurement, finance, legal, internal-control, supply-chain and website teams at equipment, electronics, automotive-parts, medical-device, hardware, chemical, packaging and export manufacturers in Changzhou and nearby. It covers how to write and accept a supplier bankruptcy/reorganization response page. The usual gap is "warning, exposure, claim declaration, retrieval/set-off/security priority, goods in transit and substitution", ending with a page that only says "change supplier", leaving the company reactive when the court accepts the case, accounts freeze and the line stops.
First calculate exposure: prepayments, moulds/tooling, customer-supplied material, inventory, goods in transit, quality claims, warranty and IP/data — how much, and can it be retrieved/set off? Then read the procedure: whether the court has accepted the case, who the administrator is, whether contracts continue or terminate, and the claim deadline. Finally fix the actions: stop new orders/freeze payments, preserve evidence, declare claims, assert retrieval/set-off/security priority, secure supply/substitute, and communicate with customers. The page states warning, procedure, rights and boundaries — not "change supplier".
How does this page relate to supplier financial risk, retention of title, mortgage/pledge, guarantees, supplier exit, quality claims and procurement-records pages?
A bankruptcy/reorganization page answers "what to do after court acceptance, how to declare claims, what can be retrieved/set off/prioritised"; the supplier financial-risk page answers "warning/exposure/contract/contingency"; the retention-of-title page answers "ownership until payment/registration/repossession"; the mortgage/pledge page answers "collateral/registration/priority/enforcement"; the guarantee page answers "third-party credit/documentary claims"; the supplier exit page answers "termination/transition/second source"; the quality-claim page answers "claims/deduction/set-off"; the procurement records page answers "how long to keep evidence". Bankruptcy is a "judicial procedure" and cannot be replaced by a financial-risk or exit page.
Common breaks: no warning; unclear exposure; prepayments continue; moulds/customer material unmarked; goods in transit unmanaged; individual payments after acceptance; missed claim deadline; incomplete amount/security/evidence; no retrieval/set-off/priority assertion; wrong continuation/termination decision; critical supplier without substitute; late customer/line communication; the website publishes supplier bankruptcy/claim amounts. The page separates "warning—exposure—procedure—claim—rights—contract—supply continuity—substitution—public boundary" so procurement/finance/legal/supply chain share one vocabulary.
| Page | Question it answers | Key content | Cannot replace |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bankruptcy/reorganization response | What to do after acceptance/how to claim/what can be retrieved | Warning, exposure, procedure, claim, retrieval/set-off/priority, supply continuity, substitution | Financial-risk/exit page |
| Supplier financial risk | Warning/exposure/contract/contingency | Monitoring, security, substitution, BCP | Bankruptcy procedure |
| Retention of title | Ownership until payment/registration/repossession | Clause, registration, repossession, redemption | Claim declaration |
| Mortgage/pledge | Collateral/registration/priority/enforcement | Type, registration, priority, enforcement | Security-priority procedure |
| Guarantee | Third-party credit/documentary claims | Bank/insurer/guarantor, text, expiry | Bankruptcy claim |
| Supplier exit | Termination/transition/second source | Exit, handover, inventory, customer | Judicial procedure |
| Quality claim | Claims/deduction/set-off | Trigger, amount, evidence, set-off | Claim declaration |
| Procurement records | How long to keep evidence | Contract, order, invoice, records | Bankruptcy rights |
Page relationships are editorial; court rulings, administrator findings, contracts and case evidence control.
Which warning signs and exposures should be mapped first?
Warning signs: unpaid wages/social insurance, supplier payment demands, overdue bills, overdue loans, litigation/enforcement/dishonesty, changes in equity/controller, frequent changes of finance/legal representative, sudden low-price orders, shutdown/power restriction/environmental penalty, loss of key staff, bank withdrawal, qualified audit opinion, related-party fund occupation. Exposure at least: prepayments/deposits, undelivered orders, goods in transit, consignment stock, moulds/tooling/gauges, customer-supplied material/parts, drawings/technical data/software/data, quality claims/rework/returns, warranty/after-sales, substitution cost, customer-contract breach. For each: amount, ownership, location, evidence, retrievability/set-off, insurance/guarantee.
Acceptance checks: warning list; triggers; exposure table; amount; ownership; location; evidence; retrieval/set-off; security; substitution. Common gaps: financial statements only; no mould/customer-material inventory; goods in transit unmanaged; prepayments continue; no evidence; no substitute.
| Signal/exposure | What to look at | Evidence | Common gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unpaid wages/social insurance | Employee complaints/arbitration/notices | Records/searches | Not monitored |
| Overdue bills/loans | Acceptance overdue/credit/litigation | Searches/notices | Statements only |
| Litigation/enforcement/dishonesty | Cases/enforcement/consumption limits | Searches | Not searched |
| Prepayments/deposits | Amount/progress/security | Contract/payment | Continue paying |
| Moulds/tooling/gauges | Ownership/location/marking | List/photos | Unmarked |
| Customer material/inventory | Quantity/ownership/consignment | Inventory/agreement | Commingled |
| Goods in transit | Shipment/receipt/payment | Waybill/BL | Unmanaged |
| Quality/warranty | Claims/rework/returns/warranty | Records/agreement | Not counted |
| IP/data | Drawings/software/data/access | List/logs | Cannot recover |
Warning/exposure is editorial; finance, legal, supply-chain inventory and public searches control.
What bankruptcy procedures exist, and what are the effects of court acceptance?
The Enterprise Bankruptcy Law provides three procedures: reorganization (rescue the business/pay debts), settlement (debtor and creditors' meeting reach an agreement) and bankruptcy liquidation (realise and distribute assets/cancel). After the court accepts a bankruptcy application, it appoints an administrator; the debtor's repayment to individual creditors is invalid; preservation measures over the debtor's property are lifted and execution proceedings suspended; civil litigation/arbitration already started but not concluded is suspended and continues after the administrator takes over; the debtor's debtors/property holders should pay/deliver to the administrator. During reorganization, security rights are suspended (if the collateral may be damaged or clearly reduced in value, the secured creditor may request restoration); the administrator may decide to continue executory contracts. The procedure, acceptance date and administrator directly affect payment, delivery, retrieval and claim actions.
Acceptance checks: procedure; acceptance ruling; administrator; individual repayment; preservation/execution; litigation/arbitration; property delivery; reorganization security rights; contract continuation/termination. Common gaps: paying after acceptance; not knowing the administrator; missing suspension; continuing execution; wrong contract decision.
| Item | Rule/effect | Basis | Common gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure | Reorganization/settlement/liquidation | Bankruptcy Law | Confused |
| Acceptance/administrator | Administrator appointed upon acceptance | Art. 13 | Unknown administrator |
| Individual repayment | Invalid after acceptance | Art. 16 | Continue paying |
| Preservation/execution | Preservation lifted/execution suspended | Art. 19 | Continue execution |
| Litigation/arbitration | Suspended; continues after takeover | Art. 20 | Default |
| Property delivery | Pay/deliver to administrator | Art. 17 | Private handover |
| Reorganization security | Suspended; restoration if value falls | Art. 75 | Forced disposal |
| Executory contract | Administrator decides continue/terminate | Art. 18 | Self-judged |
Procedure/effects are editorial; the Bankruptcy Law, judicial interpretations and court rulings control.
How should claim declaration be accepted?
After acceptance, the court announces the claim period, calculated from the announcement date, minimum 30 days and maximum 3 months; creditors should declare in writing to the administrator within the period, stating the amount and whether there is property security, with evidence. Unmatured claims are deemed due upon acceptance; interest-bearing claims stop accruing interest upon acceptance. The administrator registers, reviews and prepares the claim table; the table is submitted to the first creditors' meeting for verification; if the debtor or a creditor objects to the table, it may sue in the accepting court. The declaration should state: contract/order, delivery/acceptance, invoice/reconciliation, payment/unpaid amount, security/retention of title, liquidated damages/interest (per rules), quality claim/set-off, evidence list and contact.
Acceptance checks: announcement; deadline; administrator; written declaration; amount; security; evidence; unmatured/interest; verification; objection/litigation; supplementary declaration. Common gaps: missed deadline; phone call only; unclear amount; no evidence; missed security; missed set-off; no creditors' meeting.
| Item | What to do | Basis | Common gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deadline | 30 days–3 months from announcement | Art. 45 | Missed |
| Recipient | Written declaration to administrator | Art. 48 | Salesperson only |
| Amount/security | Amount/security/evidence | Art. 49 | Missed security |
| Unmatured/interest | Deemed due/interest stops | Art. 46 | Continue interest |
| Registration/review | Administrator registers/reviews/table | Art. 57 | No check |
| Verification | First creditors' meeting | Art. 58 | No attendance |
| Objection | Sue in accepting court | Art. 58 | Oral only |
| Supplementary | Per rules/costs | Art. 56 | Give up |
Claim declaration is editorial; the Bankruptcy Law, Interpretation (III) and court/administrator requirements control.
How should retrieval, goods in transit, set-off and security priority be accepted?
Retrieval: after acceptance, property in the debtor's possession that does not belong to the debtor may be retrieved through the administrator (e.g., consignment/customer material/leased property/moulds/tooling, provided ownership/possession can be proven); during reorganization, retrieval must meet the agreed conditions. Goods in transit: if you are the seller and the buyer is the debtor, and at acceptance the goods have been shipped but the buyer has not received them and has not paid in full, the seller may retrieve the goods in transit; the administrator may pay the full price and request delivery. If you are the buyer and the supplier is the debtor, you cannot directly apply the seller's retrieval right; focus on delivery/acceptance/payment milestones and claim declaration. Set-off: a creditor that owed the debtor before acceptance may assert set-off to the administrator, subject to statutory exceptions (acquiring claims after acceptance, knowing insolvency while incurring debt, etc.). Security priority: a creditor with security over specific property has priority over that property; the unpaid part is an ordinary claim. Guarantors/joint debtors: after bankruptcy ends, they remain liable for the unpaid part.
Acceptance checks: ownership/possession; retrieval list; transit; buyer/seller role; set-off; exceptions; security; registration; priority; unpaid part; guarantor. Common gaps: customer material treated as bankruptcy property; transit unmanaged; role reversed; no set-off; security unregistered; guarantor waived.
| Right | Key point | Basis | Common gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retrieval | Property not belonging to debtor, retrieved via administrator | Art. 38 | Not asserted |
| Goods in transit | Seller shipped/buyer not received/paid; administrator may pay full price | Art. 39 | Role reversed |
| Set-off | Mutual debts before acceptance; assert to administrator | Art. 40 | Not asserted |
| Set-off exceptions | Post-acceptance acquisition/knowing insolvency etc. | Art. 40 | Ignored |
| Security priority | Priority over specific secured property | Art. 109 | Unregistered |
| Unpaid part | Ordinary claim | Art. 110 | Waived |
| Guarantor | Continues liable for unpaid part | Art. 124 | Not pursued |
Rights are editorial; the Bankruptcy Law, Interpretations (II)/(III) and court/administrator findings control.
How should executory contracts, critical suppliers and substitution be accepted?
After acceptance, the administrator has the right to continue or terminate contracts where neither party has fully performed: it must notify the counterparty within 2 months of acceptance, or within 30 days of receiving the counterparty's demand, failing which the contract is deemed terminated; if the administrator decides to continue, the counterparty must perform but may require the administrator to provide security. Procurement should immediately map: which orders/contracts are unperformed, which are critical/sole-source, which involve moulds/customer material/WIP, and which affect customer delivery; for continued contracts, require written confirmation/security/delivery plan; for terminated contracts, declare claims/retrieve property/start a second source. Critical suppliers need substitution/safety stock/customer communication/change validation (PPAP/first article/certification), not a last-minute search when the line stops.
Acceptance checks: contract list; performance status; administrator notice; 2 months/30 days; continue/terminate; security; critical materials; substitution; safety stock; customer communication; change validation. Common gaps: no contract mapping; missed reply; continuation without security; no substitute; customer learns last.
| Item | What to do | Basis | Common gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract list | Unperformed/critical/WIP | Contract/order | No mapping |
| Administrator notice | Notify within 2 months/reply within 30 days | Art. 18 | Missed |
| Continuation | Written confirmation/security/plan | Art. 18 | No security |
| Termination | Claim/retrieval/substitution | Art. 18/53 | No claim |
| Critical materials | Sole source/bottleneck/safety stock | BOM/list | No substitute |
| Substitution | Second source/validation/PPAP/certification | Change process | Not validated |
| Customer communication | Impact/plan/substitute | Customer agreement | Last to know |
Contract/substitution is editorial; the Bankruptcy Law, contracts, customer requirements and change process control.
How should pre-bankruptcy protection and the response playbook be accepted?
Pre-bankruptcy: prepayment control/security, retention of title (clause + registration opposition), mortgage/pledge (registration/priority), guarantees/suretyship, consignment/customer-material marking and inventory, mould/tooling/gauge ownership and location records, IP/data access/return clauses, contract termination/acceleration/retrieval/audit clauses, insurance, second source/safety stock. Response: (1) trigger warning → freeze new orders/payments; (2) check court announcements/acceptance/administrator; (3) map exposure/preserve evidence; (4) stop individual repayment; (5) declare claims/assert retrieval/set-off/security priority; (6) continue/terminate contracts; (7) secure supply/substitute/communicate with customers; (8) creditors' meeting/vote/objection/litigation; (9) review/accountability/policy fix. The playbook should state owners, deadlines, templates and escalation.
Acceptance checks: prepayment; retention of title; security; guarantee; customer material; moulds; IP; contract clauses; insurance; second source; trigger; freeze; search; evidence; claim; meeting; review. Common gaps: no security; no registration; customer material unmarked; no mould list; no termination/retrieval clause; no second source; no owner.
| Stage | What to do | Evidence | Common gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prepayment | Control/security/milestones | Contract/payment | Full prepayment |
| Retention of title | Clause/registration/repossession | Contract/registration | No registration |
| Mortgage/pledge | Registration/priority/enforcement | Registration | No registration |
| Guarantee/suretyship | Text/expiry/claim | Guarantee | Expired |
| Customer material/moulds | Marking/list/location/inventory | List/photos | Commingled |
| IP/data | Access/return/deletion | Clause/logs | Cannot recover |
| Trigger/freeze | Warning/stop orders/stop payments | Approval | Continue ordering |
| Search/evidence | Announcement/administrator/evidence | Searches/list | No evidence |
| Claim/meeting | Declare/vote/object | Receipt/records | No attendance |
| Review | Loss/accountability/policy | Report | No review |
Pre-bankruptcy/response is editorial; contracts, security registration, court procedure and company policy control.
How should the website page be written, and what must not be published?
Suggested sections: (1) warning signs/exposure basis; (2) procedures/effects of acceptance; (3) claim declaration/deadline/materials; (4) retrieval/transit/set-off/security priority/guarantor; (5) contract continuation/termination/supply continuity/substitution; (6) pre-bankruptcy protection/response playbook; (7) contact/version/update date. The public page explains "principles, process, rights and boundaries", and does not publish specific supplier names/bankruptcy information, claim amounts/collateral/accounts, customer lists/substitution sources, pending litigation/reorganization plans or personal contacts; specific cases are handled by legal/finance/controlled systems.
The English page should use consistent terms (bankruptcy, reorganization, settlement, liquidation, administrator, claim declaration, right of retrieval, goods in transit, set-off, security interest/priority, guarantor, continuation/termination) and state the cut-off date. It can link to financial-risk, retention-of-title, mortgage/pledge, guarantee, supplier-exit, quality-claim and procurement-records pages, but must not become a "change supplier" notice.
| Section | What to write | Evidence | Avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warning/exposure | Signals/amount/ownership/location | List/inventory | Statements only |
| Procedure/effects | Acceptance/administrator/suspension/invalidity | Ruling/announcement | Confused |
| Claim | Deadline/amount/security/evidence | Receipt | Missed |
| Rights | Retrieval/transit/set-off/priority/guarantor | Contract/registration | Not asserted |
| Contract/supply | Continue/terminate/substitute/customer | Notice/plan | Wait for line stop |
| Pre-bankruptcy/response | Security/clauses/process/owner | Contract/policy | No plan |
| Public boundary | No supplier/amount/litigation | Access control | Publish all |
The page structure is editorial; public statements must be true and verifiable, and court rulings, administrator findings and contracts control.
Go-live acceptance checklist
Ten checks: warning/exposure; procedure/effects; claim declaration; retrieval/transit/set-off/security priority; contract continuation/termination; supply continuity/substitution; pre-bankruptcy protection; response playbook; public boundary; version/owner. Each needs evidence and a review date. The pass standard is not "the page says what to do if a supplier fails", but that procurement/finance/legal can, on the day of acceptance, freeze payments, find the administrator, map exposure, declare claims, assert rights, secure supply and substitute.
Before go-live, run a tabletop exercise with a real (redacted) supplier: warning → exposure → court acceptance → administrator → contract continuation/termination → claim declaration → retrieval/set-off/priority → supply continuity/substitution → customer communication → review. Then simulate a missed claim, customer material treated as bankruptcy property and a transit-goods dispute to see whether the page and policy work.
| Check | Pass standard | Evidence | If failed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warning/exposure | Signals/amount/ownership/location | List/inventory | Map |
| Procedure/effects | Acceptance/administrator/suspension/invalidity | Ruling/announcement | Check |
| Claim | Deadline/amount/security/evidence | Receipt | Declare |
| Rights | Retrieval/transit/set-off/priority | Contract/registration | Assert |
| Contract | Continue/terminate/security | Notice/confirmation | Correct |
| Supply/substitution | Critical/second source/validation | Plan/PPAP | Start |
| Pre-bankruptcy | Security/clauses/marking/insurance | Contract/registration | Strengthen |
| Playbook | Trigger/owner/deadline/template | Policy | Add process |
| Public boundary | No supplier/amount/litigation | Access control | Take down |
| Version/owner | Update date/owner | Page | Add owner |
The acceptance list is editorial; the Bankruptcy Law, judicial interpretations, court rulings and company policy control.
Who should read it, who should not, and what decisions does it support?
For procurement, finance, legal, internal-control, supply-chain and website teams at equipment, electronics, automotive-parts, medical-device, hardware, chemical, packaging and export manufacturers in Changzhou and nearby; also for companies building a supplier bankruptcy/reorganization page, facing a supplier bankruptcy/reorganization application, or worried about "prepayments lost, moulds/customer material not recoverable, critical material line stop". Not for teams that do not deal with supplier risk, or that want one page to replace legal/insolvency/claim-declaration advice.
Read it if: building a bankruptcy-response page; only writing "change supplier"; no exposure map; continue paying; miss the claim; no retrieval/set-off/priority; wrong continuation/termination; no substitute for critical materials; customer learns last; publishing supplier bankruptcy information. Not suitable if: treating "acceptance" as "liquidation"; treating "declaration" as "automatic recovery"; treating "customer material" as "bankruptcy property"; treating "change supplier" as "risk closed". Supports: warning/exposure, procedure/effects, claim declaration, retrieval/transit/set-off/priority, contract/supply continuity, pre-bankruptcy protection, response playbook and page wording self-checks.
FAQ
If a supplier enters bankruptcy, must it still supply existing orders?
It depends on the administrator. After acceptance, the administrator may continue or terminate contracts where neither party has fully performed: it must notify the counterparty within 2 months of acceptance, or within 30 days of the counterparty's demand, failing which the contract is deemed terminated; if it decides to continue, the counterparty must perform but may require the administrator to provide security. Procurement should immediately map contracts/orders, send a written demand and require written confirmation/security for continuation/delivery/payment.
How long is the claim declaration period, and what is needed?
The period is calculated from the court's acceptance announcement, minimum 30 days and maximum 3 months; creditors should declare in writing to the administrator within the period, stating the amount and whether there is property security, with evidence. Unmatured claims are deemed due upon acceptance; interest-bearing claims stop accruing interest upon acceptance. The administrator reviews and prepares the claim table, which is submitted to the first creditors' meeting for verification; objections to the table may be litigated in the accepting court.
Can we retrieve moulds, drawings and customer material held by the supplier?
If the property does not belong to the debtor (e.g., consignment, customer-supplied material, leased property, moulds/tooling owned by you), the owner may retrieve it through the administrator, provided ownership/possession, quantity, location and non-commingling can be proven. During reorganization, retrieval must also meet the agreed conditions. Mark ownership, keep lists/photos/agreements/inventory in advance; after acceptance, submit a retrieval application and evidence to the administrator and do not remove property yourself.
Can goods in transit be retrieved?
If you are the seller and the buyer is the debtor: where at acceptance the goods have been shipped but the buyer has not received them and has not paid in full, the seller may retrieve the goods in transit; the administrator may pay the full price and request delivery. If you are the buyer and the supplier is the debtor, you cannot directly apply the seller's retrieval right; focus on delivery/acceptance, payment under the contract and claims for non-delivery/quality issues. The role changes the right.
Can we set off debts owed by the supplier?
A creditor that owed the debtor before acceptance may assert set-off to the administrator, subject to statutory exceptions, such as acquiring the claim after acceptance or, knowing that the debtor cannot pay due debts or that a bankruptcy application has been filed, incurring a debt to the debtor. Procurement/finance should reconcile receivables/payables/quality claims/liquidated damages/prepayments item by item, prepare a set-off claim and evidence, and submit it in writing to the administrator; do not set off privately.
What about claims with mortgage/pledge/guarantee?
A creditor with security over specific property of the debtor has priority over that property; the unpaid part is declared as an ordinary claim. A guarantee/suretyship is third-party credit; claim against the bank/guarantor/surety under the guarantee contract, and it does not automatically extinguish because the debtor is bankrupt; after bankruptcy ends, the guarantor/joint debtor remains liable for the unpaid part. Register/search security interests in time to avoid losing priority.
One-sentence takeaway
The supplier bankruptcy/reorganization response page on a Changzhou manufacturer's website is not about "change supplier"; it is about turning warning/exposure, procedure/effects of acceptance, claim declaration, retrieval/transit/set-off/security priority, contract continuation/termination, supply continuity/substitution, pre-bankruptcy protection and the response playbook into a checkable list, so procurement/finance/legal can freeze payments, find the administrator, map exposure, declare claims, assert rights, secure supply and substitute on the day of acceptance.
Research method and limitations
This article is a summary of public rules and page method, not legal, insolvency or claim-declaration advice. It uses no unpublished supplier, claim amount, collateral, customer, litigation or reorganization-plan data; the tables and acceptance items are editorial and not legal conclusions. The Enterprise Bankruptcy Law, the Supreme People's Court interpretations (II) and (III), and the Civil Code; court rulings, administrator findings, contracts and case evidence control. This article does not decide whether any specific claim/retrieval/set-off/security priority/reorganization plan is valid; companies should review item by item and consult professional lawyers/certified public accountants.
Sources and basis
Current to 2026-11-08; the official pages below control.
- Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People's Republic of China (adopted 2006, effective 1 June 2007): NPC. Acceptance/administrator, invalidity of individual repayment, suspension of preservation/execution/litigation, executory contracts, retrieval, goods in transit, set-off, security priority, reorganization and distribution order.
- Supreme People's Court Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (II) (Fa Shi [2013] No. 22, amended 2020): SPC Gazette. Debtor property, retrieval, set-off, security priority, etc.
- Supreme People's Court Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law (III) (Fa Shi [2019] No. 3): Supreme People's Court. Claim declaration, creditors' meetings and creditor rights.
- Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Supreme People's Court. Basic rules on contracts, security and set-off.