Direct answer: Since 1 January 2026, where a government procurement goods project (including goods involved in a service project) has both domestic and non-domestic products competing, the domestic product's quoted price receives a 20% price deduction for evaluation. This is an evaluation preference, not an instruction to cut the contract price by 20%. "Domestic product" is not "Chinese brand" or "Chinese company"; the standard looks at three things: production in China (substantial transformation), the domestic component cost ratio meeting the prescribed percentage, and, for specific products, key components and key processes in China. Before the product-specific component-cost ratio requirement takes effect, a product meeting the "produced in China" condition is treated as a domestic product; key-component and key-process requirements for specific products apply separately as prescribed. For a multi-product project or package, the cost of products meeting the domestic product standard must reach 80% of the supplier's total product cost before the whole quotation receives the 20% deduction. The supplier issues a Declaration Letter on Compliance with the Domestic Product Standard, and the purchaser publishes it with the award result; a false declaration carries legal liability. A government procurement page on a manufacturer's website should turn "product, factory, process, component cost, declaration, supplier qualification, credit record" into a reviewable checklist, not just "domestic content / award guaranteed". Information is current to 2026-11-06. This is a review of public rules and page practice, not legal, bidding, certification or procurement advice; the latest rules, procurement documents and the finance department's interpretation control.

This guide is for export, quality, regulatory, procurement and website teams at equipment, electronics/electrical, automotive, medical device, hardware, chemical, packaging and export manufacturers in Changzhou and nearby areas. Government procurement has detailed rules and many deadlines; pages most often miss applicability, production in China, component cost, the 80% package rule, the declaration letter, the SME declaration and credit records.

Three things to remember

Domestic product means production in China plus component cost ratio plus, for specific products, key components and processes; it is not about brand nationality. The 20% is an evaluation deduction, and a multi-product package also needs 80%. The declaration letter is the main proof, and a false one carries liability. The website should state product, factory, process, components, declaration, qualification and credit, never "domestic = domestic product / award guaranteed".

How does this page relate to supplier onboarding, procurement notices and imported-equipment pages?

The government procurement page answers "how public buyers confirm our qualification and product attributes"; the supplier onboarding / AVL page answers "how private buyers add us to an approved vendor list"; the procurement notice / supplier cooperation page answers "what we buy from suppliers"; the imported equipment procurement / acceptance page answers "how we import, clear and accept equipment". Different audiences; none replaces another.

Common breakpoints: treating "domestic" as "domestic product"; treating a Chinese brand made abroad as domestic; looking only at the business licence and not the factory or process; not knowing the 80% package rule; mixing the domestic product declaration with the SME declaration; checking credit only at the last minute; "award guaranteed / inside contact". Separate "applicability, qualification, credit, product attributes, declaration, policy interplay, contract and acceptance"; then public buyers, export, quality and finance share one playbook.

PageAnswersKey contentCannot replace
Government procurementPublic buyer qualification and product attributesQualification, credit, domestic product, declarationBid / contract
Supplier onboarding / AVLPrivate buyer approved vendorQualification, capacity, audit, EHSGovernment procurement qualification
Procurement noticeWhat we buyCategories, RFQ, payment, acceptanceGovernment procurement rules
Imported equipmentBuying imported equipmentIncoterms, customs, FAT/SATDomestic product standard
Quality certificatesSystems and scopeISO 9001, IATF 16949Government procurement qualification
Nameplate / manualModel and originManufacturer, address, modelDeclaration / evaluation

This page map is editorial; the law, procurement documents and contract control.

What is the boundary of government procurement?

The Government Procurement Law applies to state organs, public institutions and social organizations using fiscal funds to procure goods, works and services within the centralized procurement catalogue or above the procurement threshold. Works procured by tender follow the Tendering and Bidding Law and its implementing regulations. State-owned enterprise procurement is not automatically government procurement; it depends on the funding, the purchaser and whether the item is within the catalogue or threshold. The 2025 domestic-product notice says state-owned, private and foreign-funded suppliers enjoy the support policy equally; that is about supplier ownership, not about turning all SOE procurement into government procurement.

Acceptance checks: purchaser; funding; catalogue/threshold; goods, works or services; tender or not; which law applies. Common gaps: treating SOE procurement as government procurement; applying the Government Procurement Law to tendered works; assuming all small purchases outside the catalogue are covered; stretching "fiscal funds"; claiming "all government projects are open to us".

ScenarioWhat to confirmEvidenceCommon gap
State organ / public institutionFiscal funds + catalogue/thresholdNotice / documentsWrong purchaser
Social organizationWhether fiscal funds are usedFunding sourceBroad application
Tendered worksTendering and Bidding LawProject typeWrong law
SOE procurementNot automatically coveredFunding / purchaserTreated as government
Small purchase outside catalogueWhether threshold is metCatalogue / thresholdAssumed covered
Goods in a service projectGoods part is coveredProcurement documentsMissed goods

Scope follows the Government Procurement Law, its implementing regulations and the procurement documents.

How should statutory supplier conditions and materials be accepted?

Article 22 of the Government Procurement Law lists six conditions: capacity to bear civil liability independently; good commercial reputation and a sound financial accounting system; the equipment and professional technical capability needed to perform the contract; a good record of paying taxes and social insurance; no major illegal record in business operations in the three years before participating; and other conditions required by laws and administrative regulations. Article 17 of the implementing regulations requires a business licence or equivalent, financial reports, tax and social insurance materials, evidence of equipment and technical capability, a written declaration of no major illegal record in the previous three years, and other required evidence. A major illegal record means a criminal penalty, an order to suspend production or business, revocation of a licence or permit, or a relatively large fine for illegal business operations.

Also check: suppliers whose legal representatives are the same person, or that have a direct controlling or management relationship, may not participate in the same contract; all consortium members must meet Article 22; where members have the same type of qualification and perform the same work under the division of labour, the lower qualification level applies; no member may participate separately or in another consortium in the same contract. The page should state "who qualifies, on what evidence, for how long, and any connected relationship", not just show a business licence.

ConditionWhat to confirmEvidenceCommon gap
Civil liabilityBusiness licence / legal personLicenceWrong entity
Reputation / financeFinancial reports / systemStatements / policyOnly "good"
Equipment / technologyRelevant to the projectEquipment / staff / casesGeneric claims
Tax / social insurancePayment recordCertificates / recordsMissing months
No major violationWritten declarationDeclarationVerbal promise
Connected partiesRepresentative / control / managementEquity / declarationUndisclosed
ConsortiumAll members / lower qualificationConsortium agreementDuplicate participation

Conditions and materials follow Article 22, Article 17 of the implementing regulations and the procurement documents.

How should credit records be checked and retained?

Under Cai Ku [2016] No. 125, purchasers and procurement agencies should check credit records through Credit China, the China Government Procurement Network and other channels, and keep the query record and evidence with the procurement documents. Suppliers listed as dishonest judgment debtors, major tax-violation parties, or in the list of serious illegal and dishonest acts in government procurement, or otherwise not meeting Article 22, must be rejected. Every consortium member is checked; an adverse record of any member is treated as an adverse record of the consortium. The procurement documents should state the channels, cutoff time, retention method and use rules.

Acceptance checks: who is checked; which lists; cutoff; evidence retention; consortium members; post-repair handling. Common gaps: checking only the bidder and not the consortium; screenshots without date or URL; cutoff after bid opening; treating Credit China as the only channel; claiming "good credit" without a record.

ItemWhat to confirmEvidenceCommon gap
ChannelsCredit China / China Government Procurement NetworkScreenshotsOnly one channel
SubjectsSupplier / consortium membersListMissing member
ListsDishonest debtor / major tax violation / procurement violationQuery resultOnly one list
CutoffAs stated in the documentsTimestampChecked after opening
RetentionKept with procurement documentsFileNo evidence
RepairPer law / documentsRepair recordVerbal claim

Credit checks follow Cai Ku [2016] No. 125 and the procurement documents; this table is editorial.

What exactly makes a product a "domestic product"?

Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34 sets three elements: first, production in China, meaning substantial transformation from raw materials and components to the product within the customs territory; second, the domestic component cost ratio meeting the prescribed percentage; third, for specific products, key components and key processes being in China. Substantial transformation excludes minor operations such as preservation during transport or storage, packaging or display for transport or sale, affixing brands, marks or labels, simple painting, polishing or repacking, and similar operations. The Ministry of Finance, with industry authorities, will set product-specific ratios, key components and key processes within five years, with a three-to-five-year transition. Before the product-specific component-cost ratio requirement takes effect, a product meeting "produced in China" is treated as a domestic product; key-component and key-process requirements for specific products apply separately as prescribed.

So "Chinese brand", "Chinese company" and "assembled in China" are not automatically domestic products; conversely, a foreign-funded enterprise producing in China and meeting the standard can enjoy the policy equally. The page should state product model, manufacturer, address, process, component cost basis and declaration, not "100% domestic content" without a calculation.

ElementMeaningEvidenceCommon misread
Production in ChinaSubstantial transformation in the customs territoryProcess / factory / recordsChinese brand = domestic
Component cost ratioDomestic component cost reaches the prescribed percentageCalculation / contracts / receiptsAssembly = domestic
Key componentsProduct-specific requirementList / purchase recordsIgnored
Key processesProduct-specific requirementProcess recordsFinal assembly only
Substantial transformationNew product, name and useProcess descriptionLabelling / repacking counts
Foreign-fundedEqual treatmentFactory in China / standardExcluded by ownership

The standard follows Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34; product-specific requirements prevail once issued.

Which goods are covered and which are not?

The domestic product standard applies to goods, including goods involved in government procurement goods projects and service projects, specifically goods categories in the Government Procurement Catalogue of Goods. It expressly excludes buildings and structures, cultural relics and exhibits, books and archives, special flora and fauna, agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery products, minerals, electricity, city gas, steam and hot water, water, food, beverage and tobacco raw materials, and intangible assets. Works themselves and pure services are not judged under the goods standard; goods involved in a service project still are.

Acceptance checks: goods or service; any goods in the service; whether the item is excluded; whether the package has multiple products; what the procurement documents say. Common gaps: treating works as goods; missing equipment in a service; forcing excluded categories; looking at only one product in a multi-product package.

ObjectCovered?EvidenceCommon gap
Goods projectYes, except exclusionsCatalogue / listNo category check
Goods in a serviceGoods part coveredProcurement documentsMissed equipment
WorksNot under goods standardProject typeForced
Pure serviceNot under goods standardService contentTreated as goods
Excluded categoryNot coveredCatalogueNot checked
Multi-product package80% testCost listSingle product only

Scope follows Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34 and the Government Procurement Catalogue of Goods.

How is the component cost ratio calculated?

Under Annex 1 of Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34, the domestic component cost is generally calculated at the second-tier component level; first-tier components may be used where that is sufficient for the determination. A first-tier component directly forms the product; a second-tier component directly forms a first-tier component; an indivisible first-tier component is treated as a second-tier component. If a second-tier component is produced in China, its full cost counts as domestic component cost; if not, it does not. Total product cost and component cost are based on accounting data, purchase contracts and purchase records.

Acceptance checks: component level; domestic or imported; cost basis; data source; model/version; who calculates. Common gaps: counting only final assembly labour; treating imported components as domestic; using estimates instead of accounting data; mixing models; using a ratio that differs from the procurement documents.

ItemRuleEvidenceCommon gap
Component levelGenerally second-tier; first-tier if sufficientBOM / processMixed levels
Domestic componentFull cost countsContract / receiptsLabour only
Imported componentDoes not countImport recordsTreated as domestic
Cost basisAccounting data / contracts / recordsCalculation sheetEstimate
Model scopeBy product / modelBOM versionMixed calculation
RatioPer product-specific ruleProcurement documentsSelf-set ratio

Calculation rules follow Annex 1 of Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34; product-specific ratios prevail once issued.

How do the 20% deduction and the 80% package rule work?

Where both domestic and non-domestic products compete, the domestic product's quoted price receives a 20% deduction for evaluation. Where the project or package contains multiple products, the supplier receives the 20% deduction on its total quotation only if the cost of its products meeting the domestic product standard reaches 80% or more of the total cost of all products it supplies; below 80%, no preference. The 20% is an evaluation deduction, not a contract discount; the contract follows the procurement documents and the bid price. Where only domestic products compete, there is no domestic-versus-non-domestic comparison for the 20% deduction; follow the procurement documents.

Acceptance checks: mixed domestic/non-domestic; single or multi-product package; 80% basis; evaluation after deduction; contract price; publication. Common gaps: treating 20% as a price cut; looking at one product in a package; calculating 80% by quantity; discounting the contract; not publishing the declaration.

ScenarioRuleEvidenceCommon gap
Single product20% deduction for evaluationQuotation / declarationContract cut
Multi-product packageDomestic cost ≥80% for the whole packageCost listCalculated by quantity
Below 80%No preferenceCalculationForced
Contract pricePer documents / bid priceContract20% off
PublicationDeclaration published with resultNoticeNot published
Policy overlapOrder stated in the documentsProcurement documentsSimple addition

The deduction follows Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34; any overlap order follows the procurement documents and the finance department's interpretation.

How should the declaration letter be completed, reviewed and published?

Annex 2 of Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34 is the Declaration Letter on Compliance with the Domestic Product Standard. It states the product name (and model, if any), manufacturer name and address (matching the manufacturer's business licence), domestic component cost ratio (may be left blank before the product-specific requirement), key components (may be blank before the requirement), key processes (may be blank before the requirement), with a seal and date. The purchaser or agency should require the declaration or another proof document specified by the Ministry of Finance; once a compliant declaration is provided, no further proof may be demanded; the declaration is published with the award result. A false declaration or false proof used to win an award is pursued under the law.

Acceptance checks: product/model; manufacturer/address; ratio; key components/processes; seal/date; consistency with the bid; publication. Common gaps: a trader declaring for the factory; address not matching the licence; missing model; self-filled ratio; declaration contradicting the BOM; no publication.

ItemWhat to confirmEvidenceCommon gap
Product/modelConsistent with the bidDeclaration / listMissing model
ManufacturerName/address matches licenceLicence / declarationTrader declares
Component costRatio basis and dataCalculation sheetSelf-filled
Key components/processesCompleted once requiredList / recordsBlank treated as compliant
Seal/dateCompleteOriginalNo seal
PublicationPublished with resultNotice pageNot published
TruthfulnessFalse declaration carries liabilityWorking papersCasual promise

The declaration format and requirements follow Annex 2 of Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34 and the procurement documents.

How does the SME policy differ, and can the two be combined?

The domestic product declaration and the SME declaration are different documents with different tests. The first looks at where the product is made, the domestic component cost ratio and key components/processes; the second looks at enterprise size, whether goods are manufactured by an SME, whether works are undertaken by an SME, and whether services are provided by an SME. Cai Ku [2020] No. 46 provides that goods and services projects above the procurement threshold and below RMB 2 million, and works projects below RMB 4 million, suitable for SMEs, should be reserved for SMEs; for goods and services above RMB 2 million and works above RMB 4 million, at least 30% of the budget should be reserved for SMEs, with at least 60% of that reserved for small and micro enterprises. Cai Ku [2022] No. 19, effective 1 July 2022, raised the price deduction for small and micro enterprises in goods and services from 6%-10% to 10%-20%, and for consortium/subcontracting from 2%-3% to 4%-6%. Both policies may appear in one project, but the order, overlap and calculation follow the procurement documents; do not simply add 20% and 20% into 40%.

Acceptance checks: enterprise size; manufacturer; declaration type; deduction rate; consortium/subcontracting; order in the documents. Common gaps: treating domestic product as SME; a trader reselling large-enterprise goods claiming SME status; mixing the two declarations; adding rates; a consortium member without a declaration.

ItemWhat to confirmBasisCommon gap
Domestic productProduction/component/processNo. 34Treated as size
SMESize/manufacturer/providerNo. 46Mixed declarations
ReservationRMB 2m / 4m / 30% / 60%No. 46Wrong thresholds
Price deduction10%-20%; 4%-6%No. 19Old 6%-10%
Consortium/subcontractMember declarations / shareNo. 46 / 19Missing member
OverlapOrder in the documentsProcurement documentsSimple addition

SME policy follows Cai Ku [2020] No. 46, Cai Ku [2022] No. 19 and the procurement documents.

How should bonds, contract, acceptance and challenge deadlines be accepted?

Article 33 of the implementing regulations: the bid bond may not exceed 2% of the project budget and must be provided by cheque, draft, promissory note, or a bank or guarantee institution's letter of guarantee, not cash; the bond is returned within five working days of the award notice for unsuccessful suppliers and within five working days of contract signing for the winner. Article 48: the performance bond may not exceed 10% of the contract amount and is also non-cash. The contract is signed within 30 days of the award notice; the contract is published within two working days of signing (except state secrets and trade secrets). Acceptance is organized against the contract's technical, service and safety standards, with an acceptance certificate. An inquiry is answered within three working days; a challenge is raised within seven working days and answered within seven working days; if unsatisfied or unanswered, a complaint may be filed within 15 working days after the answer period; the finance department decides within 30 working days.

Acceptance checks: bond ratio/form/refund; 30-day contract; two-day publication; acceptance certificate; payment; inquiry/challenge/complaint deadlines. Common gaps: bond above 2%/10%; cash only; late signing; no publication; no acceptance certificate; missed challenge period.

ItemDeadline / capBasisCommon gap
Bid bond≤2% of budget, non-cashReg. Art. 33Over cap / cash
Bond refundWithin 5 working daysReg. Art. 33Delay
Performance bond≤10% of contract, non-cashReg. Art. 48Over cap
Contract signingWithin 30 days of awardLaw Art. 46Late
Contract publicationWithin 2 working daysReg. Art. 50Not published
AcceptanceContract standards / certificateReg. Art. 45No certificate
Inquiry/challenge3 days / 7 days / 7 daysReg. 52; Law 52/53Missed deadline
Complaint15 days / 30 working daysLaw 55/56Wrong forum / late

Deadlines and caps follow the Government Procurement Law and its implementing regulations; the procurement documents may add project rules.

How should the government procurement page be written?

Suggested content: (1) applicability (government procurement / public institutions, which products and projects); (2) supplier qualification (six conditions and materials); (3) credit records (channels, lists, retention); (4) product and factory (model, manufacturer, address, process); (5) domestic product (production in China, component cost basis, key components/processes, declaration); (6) SME (size, manufacturer/provider, declaration, price deduction); (7) contract, acceptance, bonds and deadlines; (8) contact, version and update date. The public page explains rules, routes, evidence types and capability; it should not publish customer lists, bid prices, full BOM costs or unauthorised performance records; do not write "award guaranteed / inside contact / 100% domestic".

Use consistent English terms (government procurement, domestic product standard, 20% price deduction, 80% threshold, Declaration Letter, SME declaration, bid bond, performance bond) and state the review date. Link to supplier onboarding/AVL, procurement notice, supplier audit and quality certificate pages, but do not present a private procurement page as a government procurement page.

SectionWhat to writeEvidenceAvoid
ApplicabilityBuyer / product / project typeProcurement documentsAll projects open
QualificationSix conditions + materialsLicence / reports / declarationLicence only
CreditChannels / lists / retentionQuery recordsVerbal "good"
Product/factoryModel / manufacturer / address / processLicence / processBrand = origin
Domestic productProduction / components / key parts / declarationCalculation / declaration100% domestic
SMESize / manufacturer / deductionDeclarationMixed declarations
Contract/acceptanceBonds / deadlines / certificateContract / acceptanceAward guaranteed
Contact/versionEntity / date / updatePageNo date

This structure is editorial; external statements must be truthful and verifiable, per the law and the contract.

What must not be written?

High-risk claims: "domestic means domestic product" (ignores production, components and processes); "Chinese brand means domestic product" (brand is not origin); "a declaration letter guarantees the award" (it proves product attributes only); "20% is a 20% contract discount" (it is an evaluation deduction); "domestic product plus SME makes 40%" (do not simply add); "all government or SOE projects are covered" (check purchaser, funding, catalogue and threshold); "past performance is qualification" (performance and qualification are different); "the declaration can be filled casually" (false declarations carry liability). These are inaccurate or misstate scope, evaluation or responsibility.

Safer wording: "This product is manufactured at [factory/address], model [model]; under No. 34 the domestic component cost ratio is [ratio / pending product-specific requirement], key components/processes are [status]; a Declaration Letter is submitted with the bid; enterprise size / SME declaration is [status]; qualification and credit materials are [list]. The procurement documents and the finance department's determination control." External promotion must comply with advertising and fair-competition rules; customer, price and cost data need authorisation or redaction.

Go-live acceptance checklist

Ten checks: applicability, supplier qualification, credit records, product/factory, production in China, component cost, 80% package, declaration letter, SME, contract/acceptance/deadlines. Each needs an owner, evidence and review date. The pass condition is not "the page says domestic", but that a public buyer or internal team can find the entity, factory, product attributes, declaration, qualification and credit evidence.

Before go-live, run one real bid model through: applicability → qualification → credit → production in China → component cost → 80% → declaration → SME → contract/acceptance → page wording. Any step that fails is a gap in the page or the working papers.

CheckPass conditionEvidenceIf it fails
ApplicabilityPurchaser / funding / catalogue / thresholdProcurement documentsRe-assess
QualificationSix conditions + materialsLicence / reports / declarationAdd materials
CreditChannels / lists / retentionQuery recordsRe-check
Product/factoryModel / manufacturer / address consistentLicence / photoFix page
Production in ChinaSubstantial transformation / processProcess / recordsAdd evidence
Component costBasis / data / modelCalculation sheetRecalculate
80% packageCost share ≥80%ListAdjust / withdraw
DeclarationComplete / consistent / sealedOriginalReissue
SMESize / manufacturer / declarationDeclarationCorrect
Contract/deadlinesBonds / 30 days / acceptanceContract / certificateAdd process

This checklist is editorial; the law, procurement documents and contract control.

Who should read this, who should not, and what decisions does it support?

It suits export, quality, regulatory, procurement and website teams at equipment, electronics/electrical, automotive, medical device, hardware, chemical, packaging and export manufacturers in Changzhou and nearby areas; also companies bidding for government procurement for the first time, or facing changes in product, factory or components, or customer requests to update documents. It does not suit teams that only serve private customers, do not touch government procurement, or want one page to replace bid documents or legal advice.

Read it if you bid for government procurement; the product is made in China but the component cost is unclear; the package has multiple products; you receive declaration or credit-record requirements; the SME declaration and the domestic product declaration are confused. Skip it if you treat domestic as domestic product, 20% as a price cut, SOE procurement as government procurement, or want the page to promise an award. It supports self-review of applicability, qualification, credit, production in China, component cost, the 80% package, declaration, SME, contract/acceptance and page wording.

FAQ

Is "made in China" enough to be a domestic product?

Not always. The standard also requires the domestic component cost ratio to meet the prescribed percentage, and for specific products, key components and key processes in China. Before those product-specific requirements take effect, a product meeting "produced in China" (substantial transformation) is treated as a domestic product; labelling, repacking and simple painting are not substantial transformation.

Does a Chinese brand or Chinese company automatically qualify?

No. The test is where the product is made, where component costs arise, and where key components and processes are completed, not brand nationality or company registration. A Chinese brand made abroad is not "produced in China"; a foreign-funded enterprise producing in China and meeting the standard can enjoy the policy equally.

Is the 20% a direct price cut? Is the contract signed at 80%?

No. The 20% is a price deduction for evaluation; the deducted price is used for evaluation, while the contract follows the procurement documents and the bid price. A multi-product package also needs the domestic product cost share to reach 80% before the whole quotation receives the 20% deduction.

Are the domestic product declaration and the SME declaration the same?

No. The domestic product declaration proves production in China, component cost and key components/processes; the SME declaration proves enterprise size, that goods are manufactured by an SME, works are undertaken by an SME, or services are provided by an SME. The tests, formats and policy purposes differ; do not mix them.

What is the current price deduction for small and micro enterprises?

Cai Ku [2020] No. 46 originally set 6%-10% for goods and services; Cai Ku [2022] No. 19 raised it to 10%-20% from 1 July 2022, and raised the consortium/subcontracting preference from 2%-3% to 4%-6%; works follow No. 46. The procurement documents control the specific project.

Can the website say "100% domestic content, award guaranteed"?

Not recommended. Say "manufactured at [factory/address], model [model]; under No. 34 the domestic component cost ratio is [ratio / pending product-specific requirement], key components/processes are [status]; a declaration is submitted with the bid; qualification and credit materials are [list]". Do not claim "award guaranteed / inside contact", and do not present an uncalculated "100% domestic" as fact.

One-sentence takeaway

A Changzhou manufacturer's government procurement page is not about "domestic / award guaranteed". It should turn applicability, supplier qualification, credit records, production in China, component cost, the 80% package, the declaration, SME policy, contract/acceptance and deadlines into a reviewable checklist—so a public buyer or internal team can find the entity, factory, product attributes and declaration evidence.

Method and limitations

This is a review of public rules and page practice, not an audit, certification, bid review or legal opinion on any company, product, declaration or contract. No undisclosed customer, price, cost or bid data were used. Processes, document lists, tables and acceptance items are editorial suggestions, not bidding or legal conclusions. In June 2026 the draft amendment to the Government Procurement Law was published for public comment (closing 25 July 2026); this article follows the current 2014 amendment and current supporting policies. If the amendment is adopted, the new text controls. Specific applicability, qualification, credit, production in China, component cost, the 80% test, declaration, SME policy, contract and acceptance depend on the latest rules, the procurement documents and the finance department's determination.

Sources and scope

Information is current to 2026-11-06. The following are official pages; their text controls.

  1. General Office of the State Council, Guo Ban Fa [2025] No. 34, Notice on Implementing the Domestic Product Standard and Related Policies in Government Procurement: Ministry of Finance. Three elements, scope, 20% deduction, 80% package, declaration, dispute handling.
  2. Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Cai Ku [2025] No. 30, Opinions on Implementing the Notice: Ministry of Water Resources budget centre reprint. Definition of production in China, declaration review, supervision.
  3. Government Procurement Law of the People's Republic of China (2014 amendment): National Laws and Regulations Database. Scope, supplier conditions, contract, challenge and complaint.
  4. Implementing Regulations of the Government Procurement Law (State Council Order No. 658): Ministry of Ecology and Environment reprint. Supplier materials, major illegal record, bonds, acceptance, contract publication.
  5. Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Cai Ku [2020] No. 46, Measures for Promoting SMEs in Government Procurement: Ministry of Finance PDF; Ministry of Finance, Cai Ku [2022] No. 19, Notice on Further Supporting SMEs: Gov.cn. Reservation, price deduction, SME declaration.
  6. Ministry of Finance, Cai Ku [2016] No. 125, Notice on Querying and Using Credit Records in Government Procurement: Shanghai Finance Bureau reprint. Channels, lists, consortium, evidence retention.
About the author

Lingyi Information Official (delivery team) supports requirements, proposals, and acceptance for enterprise websites, brand and brochure design, smart manufacturing, and AI projects. This article is public research and project practice, not legal, bidding, certification or procurement advice; specific projects follow the latest rules, procurement documents and the contract.

Turn the government procurement page into a reviewable checklist

Bring the product/factory, production in China, component cost, declaration, supplier qualification and credit records. We will map the government procurement page into a reviewable checklist.

Book a government procurement page review